Recent Security Changes by Google and Your HubSpot Analytics

Subscribe to the Blog

Your email:

AcademyCTA



Post Onboarding Consulting Packages

Attend Live Webinars

Check out the upcoming #InboundLearning webinars and register to attend live. You'll get to ask questions and participate in the conversation.

See Upcoming Webinars

See the latest from HubSpot

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Recent Security Changes by Google and Your HubSpot Analytics

  
  
  

Recently, Google made an announcement about how new security measures will affect searches that are executed from the Google homepage (www.google.com). In short, if a user is logged into a Google account, Google will now use the secure version of the Google home page (the "SSL-enabled" version) to provide search results to that user.

So what? Well, this means that the keywords that these visitors used to find your site will no longer be accessible by third party systems, including HubSpot. 

How this affects you

This SSL-enabled version of Google affects you as a marketer (and HubSpot customer) in one central way: Search terms from the secure version of Google are not provided to other websites -- which means that third party analytics systems will no longer have access to that data.

Why not? It's always been true that searches from the SSL-enabled version of www.google.com don't pass along the search term in the "referrer" information. This change simply means that searches executed by logged-in users from Google's homepage will now be SSL-enabled, and therefore a much larger percentage of visits will now arrive without providing your website the search term.

A referrer is like the caller ID of the internet -- it records and displays the URL from which your visitor has come. Web analytics providers (like HubSpot, Google Analytics, and many others) rely on the referrer to determine what search query the visitor used to arrive at your site. In HubSpot's Sources tool, Leads tool, and in several other elements of the HubSpot product, we're able to pinpoint the keyword used by your site's visitors by using the referrer information that is provided by Google.

With these new changes, Google will no longer provide this information on search query terms for a significant segment of your organic search traffic. Instead, the data will simply tell us that the site referring the customer was www.google.com. Google Analytics, Wordpress, and other analytics providers are all subject to this new constraint.

What constitutes a significant segment of search traffic?

Google estimates the impact of this change will be "in the single-digit percentages" for all Google searchers on Google.com, meaning this should affect less than 10% of all searches.

Why such a small percentage? Because this change only involves searches that are:

  1. Launched from the www.google.com homepage
  2. Conducted by logged in users (that is, people who are logged in to Google Plus, Gmail, or any other Google properties). 

This change will not affect users who are not logged in to a Google product, nor will it affect seaches conducted from non-homepage search tools, such as the browser toolbar Google query box, or the taskbar in Chrome.

Oh, really?

That 10% estimate sounded a little fishy to us, too, so we dug into our own data to see what amount of our customer's traffic this might truly affect. And a quick check of HubSpot's own visit counts to www.hubspot.com for October 21 (after Google's announcement) showed that only 93 visits came from google.com without a referrer, as compared to 2,728 that provided a referrer (and thus a specific search term).

This translates into about 3% of our total organic search volume.

By comparison, on July 21, 2011 (about three months prior to the policy change), hubspot.com received only 7 visits out of 2,084 through secure searches on www.google.com.

This translates into about 0.3% of our total organic search volume.

So based on this preliminary data, the new changes certainly have had an effect. But this effect -- to date -- is still in the "single digit percentages," as Google predicted.

Of course, it's early days yet, so be assured that we will continue to monitor the data, and will keep an eye on how these changes affect you over time.

How will the HubSpot product adapt to these changes?

For starters, we'll be changing how we organize and categorize the data we report in your Sources tool. Specifically, in the Organic Search section, we currently aggregate all keywords that contributed to your Organic Search visit count. We will now add a new, unique line labeled "Unknown Keyword" to the table, to account for this segment of secure Google searches for which we do not know the keyword.

Unfortunately, we won't be able to continue to provide the same precise level of detail for all searches that led visitors to your site, but we will continue to provide as much as we can. And by creating this "Unknown Keyword" category within the Organic Search classification, you will be able to continue to track your overall trends within your Organic Search visit counts.

Of course, we're simplifying here what is at heart a rather complex issue. There are other considerations that have made the changes announced by Google a newsworthy story, but here we've focused on explaining just the part that affects you, the HubSpot user. If you have any questions or want to discuss these effects further, please post here in the comments, contact me directly via email, or reserve some time during my office hours.

For those interested in a more detailed analysis of Google's recent announcement, you might want to read this recent article by Danny Sullivan -- we found it to be particularly helpful as we worked through the changes ourselves.

Tags: 

Comments

This afternoon, we released to the product the solution described here.
Posted @ Friday, December 09, 2011 2:43 PM by Joshua Payne
@Bernie, unfortunately Google themselves didn't go into that level of detail in their announcements. I wish I knew too!
Posted @ Friday, December 09, 2011 2:43 PM by Joshua Payne
Thanks Josh for boiling this down so succinctly - since keywords are such a critical part of our customers content strategy, I as a HubSpotter am glad to see your team working actively on this! :)
Posted @ Friday, December 09, 2011 2:43 PM by Kirsten Knipp
Hubspot could probably estimate which keyword the user searched for, could it not? 
 
If someone lands on one of our specific pages, we know (and so does Hubspot) what l.t.keywords this page is optimized for. So instead of showing "unknown keyword", maybe something like 80% probability they searched for l.t.kw "xxxxx" would be helpful for us.  
 
The probability comes in if there are multiple kw for a specific page. 
 
But this trend is worrisome, if it grew from 0.3% to 3% in a span of 4 months. 
Posted @ Friday, December 09, 2011 2:43 PM by Bala Deshpande
"Since October [2011], between 10-15% of visits to websites from Google have no longer sent information to websites and marketers. It is safe to assume that Google will continue to expand these changes, further limiting the data available to marketers unless they're willing to pay." From the Harvard Business Review. http://www.businessweek.com/management/google-will-change-web-marketing-in-2012-12232011.html
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:31 AM by Andrew Berkowitz
I wouldn't be surprised if other business considerations came into play during the decision making process but really have no factual foundation to support a strong assertion as such.
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:31 AM by Joshua Payne
Do you think this was put in place solely for privacy purposes of the searcher?
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:31 AM by Molly
Our clients are running between 13-40% (not provided) for natural search keyword data.
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:31 AM by Eric Layland
Thanks for the heads up. I was worried about this as well, but I don't think Google would do anything to completely mess up the way marketers view their analytics. It will give less keyword results, but I don't think you should change what you are doing because of it.
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:31 AM by Jordan Krizman
Yes, as promised, we're keeping an eye on this data. We just posted an update that you'll be interested to read here
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:31 AM by Elizabeth Dunn
Any response from HubSpot? It's been two days since my post and 'Google Keywords' (SSL-enabled) are making up ~25% of my site's organic searches . . . not the 0.3 or 3.0% that was advertised.
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:31 AM by Andrew Berkowitz
This is frustrating. Google is not releasing this information to 3rd-party systems but will provide it to paying advertisers. First, I don't see HubSpot as a 3rd-party system because it is owned by Google (so it's a Google system). Second, we're already paying Google for this information via our monthly fee to HubSpot. Please explain sans the verbal gymnastics.
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:32 AM by Andrew Berkowitz
@Joy, 
Broadly no. We don't rely on the data we get on behalf of HubSpot customers about their websites to display things like "Monthly Search Volume" or to calculate difficulty. It does impact the monthly Visit number, since that is actual visit data for your site.
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:32 AM by Joshua Payne
Another question: does this affect the Keyword Grader? In other words, can HubSpot continue to effectively tell us what keywords people commonly use to search, especially for those long-tail keywords?
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:32 AM by Joy Reo
@Joy, 
Correct. We still know if its "coming from Google", we just don't know the actual keywords anymore (for this subset of traffic)
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:32 AM by Joshua Payne
So, if I understand this correctly, the new Google security rules affect the quality of our HubSpot traffic analytics, but not the quantity? In other words, we should not see any decreases in overall search engine traffic volume, correct?
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:32 AM by Joy Reo
It's interesting to me that Google would do this and not provide any data for analytics when just some months ago, they invested in HubSpot. Seems curious to me. On the one hand they believe in HubSpot and therefore Inbound Marketing, but on the other hand, won't release the data. Hmmmmm.
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:32 AM by Sam
Very interesting Blog piece. Yes it helps to stay updated with Google's behavioral patterns to make it work for self.
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:32 AM by SEO Junkies/ Advansys
Panda regulations and commitment to authentic SEO content depends on the internet marketer's ability to measure specific words and phrases. Is Google possibly 'doing harm' after all?
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:32 AM by Caryn Komensky
I'm with Dale on this one. It's worrrisome for those of us who use Google Mail, Docs, etc. as our corporate systems. More importantly, given the target market for the Smartling software product (i.e. tech savvy Web 2.0 companies), I think this percentage will be even higher for us.  
Are you guys (with other vendors?) trying to establish a 'trusted partner' relationship with Google to be able to get at this data?
Posted @ Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:32 AM by Elizabeth
Comments have been closed for this article.